“It’s another experience and an opportunity to play the game I love. “The CFL is a great league,” he said after his first practice Wednesday. I think it will make the game faster and more fun.” The defence has to be aware there’s space around them and offensive players have to understand that when we catch the ball, sometimes the guy might not be right there on us. Pro quarterbacks are pretty good, they don’t need that big a space, so it’ll be interesting to see how it goes.”īralon Addison, who generally plays the wide receiver on the short side of the field and will often team with fellow speedster Tim White beside him, says “I think it creates more space for both sides of the ball. A football is maybe a foot wide so that’s like 13 footballs you can fit into the new window. I think there’s going to be more cases for defences having to play man-to-man. This keeps the ball more centrally located in the field. “I liked the hashes where they were, being on the left side and throwing to the right, because I thought that is a strength of my game. Dane Evans says he and offensive co-ordinator Tommy Condell “have some things cooked up I think will help the offence. That goes for quarterbacks who will be throwing to the boundary side from farther away. Most players The Spec talked to, including kicker Michael Domagala, say the angles have been altered. “It’s been a little different on special teams. He says the offensive plays will remain the same but the spacing between players, and some route patterns, will likely change. Steinauer feels it’ll still be a work in progress right through the exhibition games. Like all CFL teams, the Ticats are still analyzing how the new more-closely-spaced hash marks - four yards on each side - might affect actual play.Such limits will provide players with a higher level of fundamental fairness in the appeals process. Part IV proposes a change to the disciplinary process that limits the Commissioner’s power as the League’s sole disciplinarian when dealing with on-field player conduct or conduct deemed detrimental to the game of football. ![]() Part III examines how the NBA, MLB, and NHL, have deployed their CBAs in comparison to that of the NFL. Part II discusses the NFL CBA specifically, and the particular provisions that have caused issues in recent years. In attempting to determine the source of the NFL’s flawed disciplinary process, Part I provides a brief history of the development of the four major leagues’ CBAs. ![]() While examining the cases of Tom Brady and Adrian Peterson, this note will address the question of whether Commissioner Goodell is acting outside the scope of his authority ordained by the NFL’s collective bargaining agreement (CBA), or if the language of the CBA, that grants Goodell such authority, is the source of the NFL’s flawed disciplinary process. ![]() This note engages in a comparative analysis of the disciplinary processes of the four major professional sports leagues, the National Football League (NFL), National Basketball Association (NBA), Major League Baseball (MLB), and National Hockey League (NHL), to determine why Commissioner Goodell’s disciplinary decisions have received such public criticism and have been challenged by the National Football League Players Association. The National Football League has recently faced an onslaught of public criticism stemming from its handling of disciplinary matters over the last few years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |